Range Rover Range Rover vs Chevrolet Silverado 1500 vs Honda CR-V
Range Rover Range Rover
$113,300
Chevrolet Silverado 1500
$53,599 – $54,800
Honda CR-V
$37,899 – $38,650
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing Range Rover Range Rover vs Chevrolet Silverado 1500 vs Honda CR-V. Honda CR-V offers the strongest value on price. Range Rover Range Rover leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
Range Rover Range Rover
Best Value
Honda CR-V
Fuel Economy
Range Rover Range Rover
Performance
Range Rover Range Rover
Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
Range Rover Range Rover
$113,300
Rating: 4.7/10
Chevrolet Silverado 1500
$53,599 – $54,800
Rating: 4.5/10
Honda CR-V
$37,899 – $38,650
Rating: 4.7/10
| Specification |
Range Rover Range Rover |
Chevrolet Silverado 1500 |
Honda CR-V |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Range Rover | Chevrolet | Honda |
| Model | Range Rover | Silverado 1500 | CR-V |
| Year | 2026 | 2026 | 2026 |
| Type | — | — | Suv |
| Body Style | 5-door full-size luxury SUV | Full-Size Pickup Truck | Compact Crossover SUV |
| Current Price | $113,300 | $53,599 – $54,800 | $37,899 – $38,650 |
| MSRP | $113,300 | $54,800 | $38,650 |
| Dealer Price | $113,300 | $52,499 | $37,299 |
| Engine | 3.0L turbocharged inline-6 with 48V mild-hybrid assistance | 5.3L EcoTec3 V8 | 1.5L Turbo Inline-4 |
| Horsepower | 395 hp | 355 hp | 190 hp |
| Torque | 406 lb-ft | 383 lb-ft | 179 lb-ft |
| 0–60 mph | Approximately 5.5 sec (0-60 mph) | Approx. 6.1 sec (0-60 mph) | Approx. 8.0 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | Approximately 150 mph | Approx. 112 mph | Approx. 116 mph |
| Fuel Type | Premium gasoline | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Mileage / MPG | Final 2026 EPA figures vary by configuration | 18 MPG combined (EPA est., configuration dependent) | 29 MPG combined |
| Range (EV) | Not applicable | N/A | N/A |
| Emissions | Varies by market and final certification | Meets applicable U.S. federal and state standards | Meets applicable U.S. federal and state standards |
| Battery | 48-volt mild-hybrid battery | N/A | N/A |
| Charging | Self-charging mild-hybrid system | N/A | N/A |
| Expert Rating | 4.7/10 | 4.5/10 | 4.7/10 |
| Community Reviews | 0 | 870 | 1340 |
| Performance Score | 8.8 | 8.8 | 8.2 |
| Comfort Score | 9.8 | 8.6 | 9.2 |
| Safety Score | 9.2 | 8.9 | 9.4 |
| Fuel Economy Score | 6.7 | 7.9 | 9.0 |
| Technology Score | 9.3 | 9.0 | 8.8 |
| Value Score | 7.4 | 8.7 | 9.0 |
| Pros | Exceptional ride comfort; Elegant and spacious cabin; Strong mild-hybrid inline-six; Genuine off-road capability; Advanc... | Strong maximum towing capability; Broad engine and trim lineup; Useful trailer and bed technologies; Large infotainment... | Spacious and practical cabin design; Strong standard and available safety tech; Comfortable ride and quiet interior; Com... |
| Cons | Very high purchase price; Expensive options and maintenance; Reliability record trails some rivals; Large dimensions can... | Ride quality can feel firm on rough surfaces; Fuel economy is average for the segment; Some advanced features locked to... | Acceleration is adequate rather than sporty; Higher trims increase total cost quickly; No dedicated performance-oriented... |
