Chevrolet Silverado 1500 vs Honda CR-V vs Hyundai Ioniq 6
Chevrolet Silverado 1500
$53,599 – $54,800
Honda CR-V
$37,899 – $38,650
Hyundai Ioniq 6
€45,750
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing Chevrolet Silverado 1500 vs Honda CR-V vs Hyundai Ioniq 6. Honda CR-V offers the strongest value on price. Honda CR-V leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
Honda CR-V
Best Value
Honda CR-V
Fuel Economy
Honda CR-V
Performance
Chevrolet Silverado 1500
Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
Chevrolet Silverado 1500
$53,599 – $54,800
Rating: 4.5/10
Honda CR-V
$37,899 – $38,650
Rating: 4.7/10
Hyundai Ioniq 6
€45,750
Rating: 4.7/10
| Specification |
Chevrolet Silverado 1500 |
Honda CR-V |
Hyundai Ioniq 6 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Chevrolet | Honda | Hyundai |
| Model | Silverado 1500 | CR-V | Ioniq 6 |
| Year | 2026 | 2026 | 2026 |
| Type | — | Suv | Ev |
| Body Style | Full-Size Pickup Truck | Compact Crossover SUV | Electric sedan |
| Current Price | $53,599 – $54,800 | $37,899 – $38,650 | €45,750 |
| MSRP | $54,800 | $38,650 | €45,750 |
| Dealer Price | $52,499 | $37,299 | — |
| Engine | 5.3L EcoTec3 V8 | 1.5L Turbo Inline-4 | Rear-mounted permanent-magnet synchronous electric motor |
| Horsepower | 355 hp | 190 hp | 168 kW / 229 PS / approximately 226 hp |
| Torque | 383 lb-ft | 179 lb-ft | 350 Nm / 258 lb-ft |
| 0–60 mph | Approx. 6.1 sec (0-60 mph) | Approx. 8.0 sec (0-60 mph) | 7.4 sec (0-100 km/h) |
| Top Speed | Approx. 112 mph | Approx. 116 mph | 185 km/h / 115 mph |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline | Electric |
| Mileage / MPG | 18 MPG combined (EPA est., configuration dependent) | 29 MPG combined | 13.5 kWh/100 km WLTP combined in the most efficient 84 kWh RWD configuration |
| Range (EV) | N/A | N/A | Up to 680 km / 423 miles WLTP with 18-inch wheels and digital side mirrors |
| Emissions | Meets applicable U.S. federal and state standards | Meets applicable U.S. federal and state standards | 0 g/km tailpipe CO2 |
| Battery | N/A | N/A | 84.0 kWh lithium-ion polymer battery |
| Charging | N/A | N/A | Up to 350 kW DC; 10-80% in approximately 18 minutes |
| Expert Rating | 4.5/10 | 4.7/10 | 4.7/10 |
| Community Reviews | 870 | 1340 | 0 |
| Performance Score | 8.8 | 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Comfort Score | 8.6 | 9.2 | 9.1 |
| Safety Score | 8.9 | 9.4 | 9.2 |
| Fuel Economy Score | 7.9 | 9.0 | 9.7 |
| Technology Score | 9.0 | 8.8 | 9.1 |
| Value Score | 8.7 | 9.0 | 8.8 |
| Pros | Strong maximum towing capability; Broad engine and trim lineup; Useful trailer and bed technologies; Large infotainment... | Spacious and practical cabin design; Strong standard and available safety tech; Comfortable ride and quiet interior; Com... | Up to 680 km WLTP range in the most efficient configuration; 10-80% charging in approximately 18 minutes; Highly efficie... |
| Cons | Ride quality can feel firm on rough surfaces; Fuel economy is average for the segment; Some advanced features locked to... | Acceleration is adequate rather than sporty; Higher trims increase total cost quickly; No dedicated performance-oriented... | Low rear roofline can reduce rear-seat headroom; Maximum range requires 18-inch wheels and digital side mirrors; Touch-s... |
