Audi e-tron GT vs Toyota Camry
Audi e-tron GT
$138,295
Toyota Camry
$37,999 – $38,750
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing Audi e-tron GT vs Toyota Camry. Toyota Camry offers the strongest value on price. Audi e-tron GT leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
Audi e-tron GT
Best Value
Toyota Camry
Fuel Economy
Toyota Camry
Performance
Audi e-tron GT
Toyota Camry
4.7/10Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
Audi e-tron GT
$138,295
Rating: 9.2/10
Toyota Camry
$37,999 – $38,750
Rating: 4.7/10
| Specification |
Audi e-tron GT |
Toyota Camry |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Audi | Toyota |
| Model | e-tron GT | Camry |
| Year | 2026 | 2026 |
| Type | — | — |
| Body Style | 4-door electric grand tourer | Midsize Sedan |
| Current Price | $138,295 | $37,999 – $38,750 |
| MSRP | $138,295 | $38,750 |
| Dealer Price | $134,100 | $37,499 |
| Engine | Front and Rear Permanent-Magnet Synchronous Electric Motors | 2.5L Hybrid Inline-4 |
| Horsepower | 670 | 232 hp (AWD net combined) |
| Torque | 625 lb-ft estimate | Hybrid system output (manufacturer managed) |
| 0–60 mph | 3.3s 0-60 mph with Launch Control | Approx. 6.8 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | 152 mph (245 km/h) | Approx. 112 mph |
| Fuel Type | Electric | Hybrid |
| Mileage / MPG | — | 44 MPG combined (AWD est.) |
| Range (EV) | 300 miles | N/A |
| Emissions | 0 g/km | ULEV/SULEV compliant (market dependent) |
| Battery | 105.0 kWh Liquid-Cooled Lithium-Ion Battery (97 kWh Net) | Hybrid traction battery (Li-ion, trim dependent) |
| Charging | 320 kW DC Fast Charge Capability (10% to 80% in 18 minutes) | Self-charging hybrid (regenerative + engine) |
| Expert Rating | 9.2/10 | 4.7/10 |
| Community Reviews | 0 | 1485 |
| Performance Score | 9.4 | 8.6 |
| Comfort Score | 9.3 | 9.0 |
| Safety Score | — | Toyota Safety Sense 3.0 |
| Fuel Economy Score | — | 9.5 |
| Technology Score | 9.1 | 8.9 |
| Value Score | — | 9.2 |
| Pros | Incredible 320 kW DC peak charging pace recovers driving range extremely fast; Composed high-speed lane stability via ne... | Excellent hybrid fuel economy; Smooth and quiet daily driving manners; Strong standard safety suite; Updated infotainmen... |
| Cons | Low sport-slung physical stance makes accessing the front seats tight for taller occupants; Rear luggage cargo trunk cap... | No non-hybrid engine option; Rear headroom tighter for very tall passengers; Top trims can get expensive; Sporty driving... |
