| Specification | Volvo XC40 | Toyota RAV4 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Volvo | Toyota |
| Model | XC40 | RAV4 |
| Year | 2026 | 2026 |
| Type | — | — |
| Body Style | SUV | Compact Crossover SUV |
| Specification | Volvo XC40 | Toyota RAV4 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | $45,295 | $35,699 – $36,450 |
| MSRP | $45,295 | $36,450 |
| Dealer Price | $43,900 | $35,199 |
| Specification | Volvo XC40 | Toyota RAV4 |
|---|---|---|
| Engine | 2.0L Turbocharged Inline 4-Cylinder with 48V Mild Hybrid | 2.5L Hybrid System |
| Horsepower | 247 hp @ 5,400 rpm (194 hp B4 FWD) | 236 hp (AWD net combined) |
| Torque | 258 lb-ft @ 1,800-4,800 rpm (221 lb-ft B4 FWD) | Hybrid system output (manufacturer managed) |
| 0–60 mph | 6.1 sec (0-60 mph B5 AWD / 8.1 sec B4 FWD) | Approx. 7.0 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | 112 mph (electronically limited) | Approx. 115 mph |
| Specification | Volvo XC40 | Toyota RAV4 |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Type | Premium Unleaded Gasoline | Hybrid |
| Mileage / MPG | 26 MPGe combined (23 City / 30 Hwy B5 AWD) | 40 MPG combined (AWD hybrid est.) |
| Range (EV) | 425 miles total highway tank range | N/A |
| Emissions | 315 g/mi CO2 | ULEV/SULEV compliant (market dependent) |
| Battery | 12V starter battery + 48V mild-hybrid lithium-ion battery | Lithium-ion hybrid battery |
| Charging | Self-charging regenerative braking | Self-charging hybrid (regenerative + engine) |
| Specification | Volvo XC40 | Toyota RAV4 |
|---|---|---|
| Expert Rating | 4.6/10 | 4.7/10 |
| Community Reviews | 910 | 1720 |
| Performance Score | 8.5 | 8.5 |
| Comfort Score | 9.2 | 8.9 |
| Safety Score | Volvo City Safety Suite | 9.4 |
| Fuel Economy Score | 8.7 | 9.5 |
| Technology Score | 9.4 | 8.8 |
| Value Score | 9.0 | 9.2 |
| Specification | Volvo XC40 | Toyota RAV4 |
|---|---|---|
| Pros | Industry-leading active and passive safety features backed by Top Safety Pick+ ratings; Native Google built-in software... | Excellent hybrid fuel economy; Strong reliability and resale reputation; Comprehensive standard safety features; Practic... |
| Cons | 9.0-inch vertical screen is smaller than newer curved displays found in some German rivals; Climate controls are embedde... | Ride can feel firm on rough roads; Interior design is functional rather than luxurious; Higher trims increase cost quick... |