Mazda CX-5 vs Chevrolet Silverado 1500 vs Honda CR-V
Mazda CX-5
$38,990
Chevrolet Silverado 1500
$53,599 – $54,800
Honda CR-V
$37,899 – $38,650
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing Mazda CX-5 vs Chevrolet Silverado 1500 vs Honda CR-V. Honda CR-V offers the strongest value on price. Mazda CX-5 leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
Mazda CX-5
Best Value
Honda CR-V
Fuel Economy
Honda CR-V
Performance
Chevrolet Silverado 1500
Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
Mazda CX-5
$38,990
Rating: 8.7/10
Chevrolet Silverado 1500
$53,599 – $54,800
Rating: 4.5/10
Honda CR-V
$37,899 – $38,650
Rating: 4.7/10
| Specification |
Mazda CX-5 |
Chevrolet Silverado 1500 |
Honda CR-V |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Mazda | Chevrolet | Honda |
| Model | CX-5 | Silverado 1500 | CR-V |
| Year | 2026 | 2026 | 2026 |
| Type | Suv | — | Suv |
| Body Style | 5-door compact crossover suv | Full-Size Pickup Truck | Compact Crossover SUV |
| Current Price | $38,990 | $53,599 – $54,800 | $37,899 – $38,650 |
| MSRP | $38,990 | $54,800 | $38,650 |
| Dealer Price | $37,800 | $52,499 | $37,299 |
| Engine | SkyActiv-G 2.5L 4-Cylinder DOHC 16-Valve with i-Stop | 5.3L EcoTec3 V8 | 1.5L Turbo Inline-4 |
| Horsepower | 187 | 355 hp | 190 hp |
| Torque | 186 lb-ft | 383 lb-ft | 179 lb-ft |
| 0–60 mph | 7.9s 0-60 mph estimate | Approx. 6.1 sec (0-60 mph) | Approx. 8.0 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | 130 mph | Approx. 112 mph | Approx. 116 mph |
| Fuel Type | Regular Unleaded | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Mileage / MPG | — | 18 MPG combined (EPA est., configuration dependent) | 29 MPG combined |
| Range (EV) | 0 miles | N/A | N/A |
| Emissions | 158 g/km | Meets applicable U.S. federal and state standards | Meets applicable U.S. federal and state standards |
| Battery | Conventional 12V Battery with Smart Regenerative i-Stop | N/A | N/A |
| Charging | Not Applicable | N/A | N/A |
| Expert Rating | 8.7/10 | 4.5/10 | 4.7/10 |
| Community Reviews | 0 | 870 | 1340 |
| Performance Score | 8.5 | 8.8 | 8.2 |
| Comfort Score | 8.8 | 8.6 | 9.2 |
| Safety Score | — | 8.9 | 9.4 |
| Fuel Economy Score | — | 7.9 | 9.0 |
| Technology Score | 8.9 | 9.0 | 8.8 |
| Value Score | — | 8.7 | 9.0 |
| Pros | Upscale interior architecture that easily competes with entry luxury classes; Substantially larger display interfaces fe... | Strong maximum towing capability; Broad engine and trim lineup; Useful trailer and bed technologies; Large infotainment... | Spacious and practical cabin design; Strong standard and available safety tech; Comfortable ride and quiet interior; Com... |
| Cons | Naturally aspirated engine lacks the explosive acceleration of turbocharged rivals; Six-speed automatic is reliable but... | Ride quality can feel firm on rough surfaces; Fuel economy is average for the segment; Some advanced features locked to... | Acceleration is adequate rather than sporty; Higher trims increase total cost quickly; No dedicated performance-oriented... |
